Showing posts with label gay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
APPLE REMOVES CONTROVERSIAL 'GAY CURE' APP FROM APP STORE
Exodus International made news last week with the release of its self-titled application in Apple’s App Store. The organization billed the application as a "resource for those looking to help cure themselves or someone else of homosexuality." Now the app is making news again, as Apple has pulled it from the App Store.
Apple has been a quiet supporter of gay rights, and during the 2008 Proposition 8 campaign in California, the company issued the following statement: “Apple was among the first California companies to offer equal rights and benefits to our employees’ same-sex partners, and we strongly believe that a person’s fundamental rights — including the right to marry — should not be affected by their sexual orientation.” The statement, which was made via its website, accompanied a $100,000 donation to the campaign opposing “Prop 8.”
An online petition started by change.org collected over 140,000 signatures in an attempt, which appears to have been successful, to get Apple to remove the controversial Exodus app. Apple has yet to issue a statement to articulate why Exodus’ application was removed from its mobile app store.
Labels:
anti gay,
App,
app store,
Apple,
controversial,
controversy,
exodus international,
gay
Thursday, January 20, 2011
MEET TIM COOK, APPLE'S NEW CEO AND MOST POWERFUL GAY MAN IN SILICON VALLEY
It looks increasingly like Steve Jobs' reign at Apple is over. If the CEO doesn't return from his third, indefinite medical leave, COO Tim Cook will succeed him, marking a new era not only for Apple but for gay progress.
Cook, who is running Apple in Jobs' absence, has been as reticent to acknowledge his sexuality as he has his prowess in overseeing the company supply chain. But as Jobs fades back, and as his absences grow more prolonged and uncertain, Cook will become, by necessity, a public figure. Apple is no longer a 1980's-style computer company, segregated from broader society. Apple is one of the most powerful players in industries like publishing, music, movies, internet services, advertising, mobile communications and, of course, computer hardware and software. And the company and its leader have become cultural icons.
Cook, a famously quiet and collected person, will find his backstory, both personal and professional, the topic of increasing interest and discussion in the tech community. That new attention is a good thing for a man with a reputation as fearsomely good as Cook's. Cook's rise to his position—he is one of the most powerful corporate executives in the world, to say nothing of being the most powerful gay person in tech by a mile—is also a tribute to his skill and work ethic on the one hand, and to the utterly unconventional and unconventionally empowering people skills of Jobs on the other.
Age: 50
Job: Cook's title is Chief Operating Officer at Apple. His real job is de facto CEO, overseeing day to day operations during titular CEO Steve Jobs' indefinite medical leave. Of course, Jobs retains both his title and power, and is expected to make his heavy influence felt remotely.
Background: Cook grew up in Robertsdale, Alabama, the son of a retired shipyard worker. He earned a Bachelor's degree in industrial engineering from Auburn University in 1982 and an MBA from Duke University in 1988. Before Apple, he did a stint at a computer reseller called Intelligent Electronics, worked in PC logistics for 12 years at IBM, and spent six months as VP for Corporate Materials at Compaq. He joined Apple in 1998 as senior vice president of operations, overseeing computer manufacturing. Cook was later promoted to chief of worldwide sales and of the Macintosh division.
Wealth: Cook has sold or accumulated upwards of $136 million in Apple shares.
How he got the job: Cook joined Apple in 1998, shortly after Jobs' return to the company, after withstanding Jobs' withering interview gauntlet. Jobs had rejected a string of other operations managers before meeting with Cook. In fact, one other executive from Cook's old company, Compaq, reportedly lasted only five minutes before Jobs walked out on him. Cook's "unflappable" demeanor may have been what sealed the deal with Jobs. "Steve is very focused on people he can connect to emotionally," a recruiter present at the meeting later said.
His successes: Cook made his mark early on by fixing Apple's notorious manufacturing inefficiencies: He arranged to have suppliers physically adjacent to Apple factories, thereby reducing inventory—which he considers "fundamentally evil"—to six days from 31. He closed far-flung Apple factories and warehouses and shifted to contract manufacturers. And he helped the company accurately predict demand for unreleased products, as when he prepaid $1.25 billion to corner the market for years to come on a particular type of flash memory that would prove crucial in forthcoming Apple devices. These operational improvements have given Apple the agility necessary to make quick, dramatic changes to its products, like when it switched the entire computer line to Intel chips in 2006.
Cook also kept the company on track as Apple's interim leader during Jobs' 2004 two month medical leave and during his six month leave in 2009. His steady hand kept iPhone 4 and iPad development on track, grew Macintosh sales and strongly rallied the stock.
His temperament: Calm, quiet — and deadly. His southern accent and "courtly demeanor" can disarm subordinates, and Cook never raises his voice, but his default frown and long, uncomfortable silent stares hint at the demanding leader underneath. He is said to keep an exhaustive catalog of details of Apple's operations in his head and expects his charges to do the same. "I've seen him shred people," a former colleague told Fortune in a lengthy 2008 profile. "He asks you the questions he knows you can't answer, and he keeps going and going. It isn't funny, and it's not fun."
Work habits: Voracious. Cook is described as a workaholic who begins emailing his underlings at 4:30 am each morning and eschews Apple's famously good cafes for an endless series of energy bars, which he'll often devour during meetings. The COO prides himself on being the first into the office and the last one out. At IBM, he volunteered to work in the factory on Christmas and New Year's day. He expects similar commitment from others; Cook once dispatched an underling straight from a meeting at Apple headquarters in Cupertino to the airport bound for China, without time even to pack a change of clothes or figure out a return date. "Why are you still here?" was Cook's goodbye, delivered in the middle of the meeting.
Shortcomings: Cook is not known as a product visionary or for shepherding projects through Apple's rigorous development pipeline. For those sorts of tasks, Jobs' heir apparent is design chief Jonathan Ive, principal designer for the iMac, iPod, iPhone, and iPad, among other groundbreaking products. Cook is also not known as a compelling public speaker, which is probably why marketing chief Phil Schiller has handled the unveiling of new Apple products during Jobs' past absences.
The future: Cook has been with Apple for 13 years now and given his new role at the company, it's not expected that he's making plans to leave in the future. That said, he's reportedly been wooed by both Motorola and Dell, and possibly HP.
Interests: Cook is a "fitness nut," in the gym by 5 am, often on the hiking trail and even more often on his bike. The avid cyclist is an admirer of Lance Armstrong, quoting the seven-time Tour de France winner regularly during Apple meetings and even reportedly modeling his close-cropped haircut after the rider. Like Jobs, Cook is a Bob Dylan fan, and at one point, at least, kept a picture of the singer in his office, alongside a shot of Bobby Kennedy. His truest loyalty, beyond even Apple, may be to the Auburn Tigers football team, whose memorabilia is said to stud his home and office.
Social style: Cook is relatively withdrawn. A former college classmate described him as "not a real social person...He just never seemed that interested in other people. I'm a hugger and a kisser, but I'd never feel comfortable giving Tim a hug or a kiss."
Romantic interests: After Cook was profiled as a "lifelong bachelor" and "intensely private" elsewhere, we wondered if he might be gay. We've since heard from two well-placed sources that this is indeed the case, and it sounds like Cook's sexuality has been the topic of at least some discussion within the company. One tech executive who has spoken to multiple Apple management veterans about Cook was told executives there would support Cook if he publicly acknowledged his orientation, and even would encourage him to do so as he steps up his leadership role, but that they also had concerns about whether his coming out would impact the perception of the Apple brand.
Cook would be, by far, the most powerful openly gay executive in tech, trailed by Microsoft's openly lesbian HR chief Lisa Brummel and by Megan Smith, the former PlanetOut CEO now working as Google's vice president of new business development.
Relationships: If Cook is in a long term partnership, he's kept it well hidden. Given his brutal work schedule, though, it's hard to imagine how he'd find time. Still, he's got enough experience to have developed some preferences; our tech executive source claims Cook is into Asian guys, a tidbit that prompted another tech observer, with whom we shared the item, to propose some strategic matchmaking that would pair Cook with Google hotshot Ben Ling. It's an inspired match: Perhaps the coupling could build a bridge between two corporate nemeses.
Darkest moment: Cook was misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1996, an experience he later said made him "see the world in a different way." He now helps raise money for the disease.
Signature look: Cook serves on Nike's board, which is why you'll see him sporting Nike shoes under his jeans around the Apple office.
Monday, November 29, 2010
GAYS, LESBIANS, BISEXUALS MORE LIKELY TO USE INTERNET
According to the Spring 2010 Experian Simmons GLBT study, gays/lesbians/bisexuals (GLB) are above average in internet usage. A little over 46% of the group ranks above average for Internet Activity, while just under 17% are average. In comparison just under 33.5% of heterosexuals are above average, while almost 23% are average. Experian Simmons' definition of Internet Activity is it "indicates the overall general online activity level for a respondent".
Interestingly, if we look at just gay men versus heterosexual men the gay men's group jumps to almost 52.5% for being above average for internet activity while the heterosexual men's group slips slightly to just under 32.75%.
All four groups, GLB, Heterosexuals, Gay men and heterosexual men all are about the same level for being below average for internet activity, ranging from 25% for gay men to 28.75% for heterosexual men.
If we look at propensity to be above average by group we find the gay men are 55% more likely to be above average in internet activity and GLB as a whole are 37% more likely. Heterosexuals are 1% less likely to be above average in internet activity and heterosexual men are 3% less likely to be above average.
The study is of LGBT and heterosexual adults 18 years of age and older.
About Experian Simmons: Experian Simmons brings consumer targets to life with vivid and complete profiles including lifestyles, attitudes, purchase behaviors and media use. For over 50 years, Experian Simmons has delivered the superior consumer research insights that performance-driven marketers need to make confident decisions necessary to grow their business. The high quality custom and syndicated research privides clients with fast and easy access to vivid consumer profiles of national and local populations, including detailed insights into the multi-faceted Hispanic community.
Labels:
experian simmons,
gay,
glb,
heterosexual,
study
Thursday, October 21, 2010
IS FACEBOOK OUTING GAY USERS?
Researchers from Microsoft and Germany's Max Planck Institute wanted to see if Facebook targeted ads based on sexuality, so they created six fake profiles: two straight men, two straight women, a gay man and a lesbian. They found that the ads displayed on the gay man's profile differed substantially from those on the straight one. This isn't surprising, since a gay bar doesn't want to place its ads on the profiles of straight men. But many ads targeted exclusively to gay men had nothing to do with, and made no mention of, their sexuality—for example, one ad hawked a Florida nursing school. (Half of ads targeted to gay men didn't mention the word "gay" in the text.)
The paper explains why this is a concern:
The danger with such ads, unlike the gay bar ad where the target demographic is blatantly obvious, is that the user reading the ad text would have no idea that by clicking it he would reveal to the advertiser both his sexual-preference and a unique identiļ¬er (cookie, IP address, or email address if he signs up on the advertiser's site).
Cookies and IP addresses aside, let's say you click on that ad for the nursing school that targeted its advertising only to gay men. You fill out an application and mention that you saw their ad on Facebook. The school now knows you're a man who is interested in men, even if you've hidden your sexual preference using Facebook's privacy settings.
Of course, if you're comfortable enough to put it on your Facebook profile, you're probably OK with some people knowing you're gay. But whereas Facebook's privacy settings allow you to choose who can see your sexual preference, you have no control over what information Facebook uses to target advertising. Facebook's privacy policy states that it can even use "information you may have decided not to show other users (such as your birth year or other sensitive personal information or preferences) to select the appropriate audience for... advertisements." Anything you put on your profile is fair game.
Facebook's company line is that it doesn't shares your personal information with advertisers, and the only information it uses to target ads is anonymous. But coming on the heels of revelations that Facebook leaked user information to advertisers through third-party apps, this latest snafu underscores how nearly impossible it is for Facebook to both profit from your personal information and to guarantee it will never be shared without your permission. [Slight Paranoia]
The paper explains why this is a concern:
The danger with such ads, unlike the gay bar ad where the target demographic is blatantly obvious, is that the user reading the ad text would have no idea that by clicking it he would reveal to the advertiser both his sexual-preference and a unique identiļ¬er (cookie, IP address, or email address if he signs up on the advertiser's site).
Cookies and IP addresses aside, let's say you click on that ad for the nursing school that targeted its advertising only to gay men. You fill out an application and mention that you saw their ad on Facebook. The school now knows you're a man who is interested in men, even if you've hidden your sexual preference using Facebook's privacy settings.
Of course, if you're comfortable enough to put it on your Facebook profile, you're probably OK with some people knowing you're gay. But whereas Facebook's privacy settings allow you to choose who can see your sexual preference, you have no control over what information Facebook uses to target advertising. Facebook's privacy policy states that it can even use "information you may have decided not to show other users (such as your birth year or other sensitive personal information or preferences) to select the appropriate audience for... advertisements." Anything you put on your profile is fair game.
Facebook's company line is that it doesn't shares your personal information with advertisers, and the only information it uses to target ads is anonymous. But coming on the heels of revelations that Facebook leaked user information to advertisers through third-party apps, this latest snafu underscores how nearly impossible it is for Facebook to both profit from your personal information and to guarantee it will never be shared without your permission. [Slight Paranoia]
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
GAYS, LESBIANS, BISEXUALS MORE LIKELY TO HAVE DVR
According to the latest release, Spring 2010, of the LGBT study by Experian Simmons gays, lesbians and bisexuals (GLB) are more likely to have a DVR than the average adult in the US. According to the study 34.78% of all US adults have a DVR. GLB adults however are at almost 41% while heterosexual adults are at 34.59%.
If we break down the GLB adults, we find that just over 52% of gays have DVRs while lesbians are more in line with heterosexuals at 34.69%.
Looking at likelihood of ownership, gays are 50% more likely than the average adult to own a DVR while heterosexuals are 1% less likely.
If we break down the GLB adults, we find that just over 52% of gays have DVRs while lesbians are more in line with heterosexuals at 34.69%.
Looking at likelihood of ownership, gays are 50% more likely than the average adult to own a DVR while heterosexuals are 1% less likely.
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Gays Lesbians more likely to be early adopters of tech
According to Experian Simmons Fall 2009 LGBT study, gays and lesbians are 29% more likely to be above average early adopters of tech vs. 1% less likely for straights.
Almost 45 of gays and lesbians are above average early adopters while only 34% of heterosexuals are above aveage early adopters. Conversely, almost 47% of heterosexuals are below average for early adoption of tech vs. 38% for gays and lesbians.
Should the tech sector put more money and effort into marketing to the gay and lesbian community?
Almost 45 of gays and lesbians are above average early adopters while only 34% of heterosexuals are above aveage early adopters. Conversely, almost 47% of heterosexuals are below average for early adoption of tech vs. 38% for gays and lesbians.
Should the tech sector put more money and effort into marketing to the gay and lesbian community?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




